 |
| Deconstruction in Process Leonhard Lenz, CC0, via Wikimedia Commons |
The announcement of the Booker Prize winner is always a seismic event in the literary world, but the 2025 award to Jonathan Szalay for his novel, Flesh, felt less like a surprise coronation and more like the fulfillment of a long-standing prophecy.
Szalay, often celebrated quietly among peers as a “writers’ writer” and previously recognized on Granta’s Best of Young British Novelists list in 2013, has finally achieved the widespread recognition long due.
The novel Flesh is not merely a technically proficient work; it is a profound literary achievement that redefines contemporary European fiction. Its distinction lies in three interwoven characteristics: a highly fragmented narrative structure that demands active reader participation, a searing thematic preoccupation with human vulnerability and existential failure, and a minimalist yet deeply resonant prose style that justifies his reputation as a master craftsman.
This essay will dissect these core literary characteristics of Flesh, demonstrating how the novel synthesizes formal innovation with profound emotional depth. The genesis of the novel—born, as the author has revealed, from the failure and subsequent abandonment of a 100,000-word manuscript—imbues the final text with an authenticity of struggle that translates directly into its formal architecture and central themes.
The Fragmented Narrative Structure: A Polyphonic Labyrinth
One of the most immediate and impactful literary characteristics of Flesh is its non-linear, fragmented narrative structure. Building upon the groundwork laid in his 2016 shortlisted work, All That Man Is—which itself courted controversy over its classification as a novel versus an interlinked collection—Flesh fully commits to a polyphonic, mosaic structure. The novel is composed of seven distinct, loosely connected sections, each introducing a new protagonist, spanning different ages, socio-economic strata, and geographies across modern Europe.
Unlike a traditional episodic structure, the linkages in Flesh are not chronological but thematic and symbolic, operating through subtle repetitions of imagery—a recurring coastal town, a specific type of bureaucratic failure, or a piece of classical music heard in passing. This structural fragmentation forces the reader to assume an active, almost investigative role, piecing together a larger, unsettling picture of contemporary life.
This technique mirrors the very subject it explores: the fractured nature of modern human experience, where individuals exist in close proximity yet profound isolation. The constant shifting of perspective denies the reader the comfort of a single, stable narrator, enhancing the sense of existential disorientation and thematic ambiguity.
Szalay uses these interlinked fragments as a meta-commentary on the difficulty of defining a singular, cohesive life narrative. Just as the author himself had to abandon a prior, seemingly complete, 100,000-word attempt due to a "central concept [that] was wrong," the structure of Flesh suggests that the human experience is not a smooth, continuous line but a series of broken attempts and restarts.
The result is a novel of vast, implied scope, wherein the seemingly disparate lives coalesce to form a single, sprawling landscape of collective contemporary European fiction—a landscape defined by economic precarity and emotional exhaustion.
Thematic Preoccupation with Vulnerability and Existential Failure
The central theme of Flesh is arguably captured in its title: the raw, biological, and utterly vulnerable state of being human. The novel’s characters are united not by ambition or success, but by the shared weight of failure—personal, professional, and moral. Szalay masterfully uses the narrative context—the failure of an entire preceding novel—to lend profound weight to this theme. The book becomes a literary monument to the concept of the necessary collapse.
In Flesh, failure is not terminal but catalytic. Characters face a range of devastating setbacks: a disgraced politician attempting a quiet return to public life, an aging athlete confronting the irreversible decline of his body, and a young mother grappling with postpartum exhaustion and the failure of idealized domesticity.
Szalay delves into the fragility of the corporeal world, examining how the limitations of the physical body and the psychological burden of past mistakes define the present. This exploration is particularly sharp in its depiction of men, echoing the sensitive, if often bleak, study of masculinity found in All That Man Is.
The thematic complexity is achieved through contrast. The novel contrasts the cold, institutional systems (banking, law, politics) that often precipitate these personal failures with the hot, chaotic reality of human emotion. The recurring image of exposed ‘flesh’ serves as a metaphor for the raw, unprotected self, vulnerable to the systemic indifference of the modern world.
However, the true brilliance of the novel lies in its subtle hints of grace and potential redemption found in the spaces after the fall. It suggests that integrity, or at least self-knowledge, can only be achieved when all external props—career, status, family structure—have been stripped away, leaving only the essential, exposed self. This thematic depth makes Flesh essential reading for understanding Szalay's thematic complexity in the 21st century.
Minimalist Prose and Resonant Style: The 'Writers' Writer' Masterpiece
Szalay has long been lauded for his technical mastery, earning the epithet of the “writers’ writer.” Flesh is the clearest demonstration yet of this skill, characterized by a minimalist prose style that is taut, economical, and deeply evocative. His sentences are surgically precise, stripped of unnecessary adjectives or flourishes. This austerity of language creates a palpable sense of tension and emotional withholding, where vast oceans of feeling are conveyed through subtle inflections and unspoken gestures.
The stylistic restraint is a deliberate choice that serves the novel’s themes. In a world saturated with information and noise, Szalay’s characters often struggle to articulate their deepest vulnerabilities. The minimalist dialogue and sparse descriptive passages force the reader to fill the emotional silence, leading to a more intimate and unsettling reading experience. The style, therefore, is not merely aesthetic; it is part of the novel’s philosophical framework, reflecting the communicative breakdown and emotional distance that define contemporary existence.
For example, a character’s decade-long professional disillusionment might be summarized in two perfectly weighted paragraphs detailing only a dusty office window and a discarded commuter ticket. This reliance on metonymy and synecdoche—where the part stands in for the whole—is the hallmark of his literary craft. This technique prevents the novel from becoming overtly sentimental, ensuring that the emotional devastation is felt keenly without being dramatically overstated.
This stylistic mastery confirms that Szalay’s Booker Prize is a triumph of literary precision, demonstrating that brevity, when wielded by a master, is the ultimate form of expressive power. The cumulative effect of this understated prose is the creation of a powerful, lasting emotional echo that far outlasts the final page.
Conclusion
The Booker Prize 2025 selection of Jonathan Szalay’s Flesh is a landmark moment, recognizing a work that is formally challenging and emotionally devastating in equal measure. The novel’s distinctive literary characteristics—its fragmented, polyphonic narrative structure, its relentless thematic exploration of failure and vulnerability, and its masterful, minimalist prose style—coalesce to create a singular, unforgettable reading experience.
By demanding that the reader work to connect the fractured lives of his European cast, Szalay offers not just a story but a complex, empathetic portrait of the modern human condition. This work, forged from the ashes of a previous literary failure, proves that in the hands of a master craftsman like Szalay, vulnerability and formal innovation are the true engines of literary transcendence, setting a new, rigorous benchmark for contemporary European fiction.
