Techniques of Character Creation by J. M. Coetzee
In Disgrace, David Lurie does not announce his moral failures; they surface gradually—through silences, through gestures, through the spaces between his actions and their consequences.
This is how J. M. Coetzee creates character: not by telling us who his figures are, but by placing them in situations that quietly expose them.
Coetzee’s characters often appear restrained, even opaque. They rarely confess, rarely explain themselves, and rarely invite sympathy. Yet, through their choices, habits, and inner hesitations, they emerge with striking psychological depth. His technique of character creation is grounded in minimalism, ethical tension, narrative distance, and the relentless pressure of circumstance.
Character Revealed Through Action and Silence
In Waiting for the Barbarians, the Magistrate does not deliver lengthy moral speeches about empire and cruelty. Instead, he hesitates. He delays. He performs small acts of kindness that feel inadequate even to himself. Each pause becomes a moral statement.
This reliance on action over exposition aligns with Coetzee’s “showing” technique. Readers watch characters respond to power, guilt, and fear without authorial commentary. A refusal to sign a document, an inability to speak at the right moment, or a decision made too late—these moments shape character more forcefully than psychological explanation ever could.
Minimalism and Narrative Restraint
In Life & Times of Michael K, Michael does not articulate his inner life in abstract terms.
His body tells the story instead: his hunger, his exhaustion, his refusal to be absorbed into bureaucratic systems. The simplicity of his actions contrasts sharply with the complex political world surrounding him. Through this minimalism, Coetzee crafts characters who resist interpretation even as they demand attention.
The absence of overt emotional guidance forces readers to participate actively in constructing character, making the experience intimate and unsettling.
Ethical Pressure as a Tool of Characterization
In Disgrace, David Lurie’s transformation is not announced as redemption. Instead, it unfolds in uneasy fragments: his care for animals, his acceptance of humiliation, his inability to justify himself any longer.
Coetzee does not frame these actions as moral victories. He simply shows them accumulating, quietly reshaping the man.
Characters, in Coetzee’s work, look at the character like Lucy in Disgrace, are revealed at the point where comfort collapses. How a character behaves when stripped of authority, language, or certainty becomes the truest measure of who they are.
Psychological Interior Without Confession
In Elizabeth Costello, the titular character delivers lectures that seem authoritative, even dogmatic.
Yet her private doubts, her exhaustion, and her sense of isolation leak through indirectly—through moments of embarrassment, failed communication, and strained relationships. Coetzee shows the instability beneath intellectual certainty without explicitly diagnosing it.
This technique mirrors real human consciousness, where clarity is rare and self-knowledge incomplete. Characters become believable not because they understand themselves, but because they don’t.
The Body as a Site of Character
Coetzee frequently anchors character in the physical body. Pain, aging, illness, and vulnerability are not symbolic flourishes; they are lived experiences that shape identity.
Michael K’s frail body, Elizabeth Costello’s aging frame, and the tortured bodies in Waiting for the Barbarians all speak where language fails. Through physical limitation and suffering, Coetzee shows how character is shaped by what the body endures.
These bodily details are rendered without sentimentality. The body is not romanticized; it is stubborn, fragile, and often humiliating. Yet it is through this corporeal realism that Coetzee achieves emotional power.
Characters as Moral Questions, Not Answers
Coetzee does not construct characters to embody clear ideologies. Instead, they function as questions posed to the reader. The Magistrate’s kindness does not absolve him. David Lurie’s suffering does not redeem him. Elizabeth Costello’s compassion does not resolve her contradictions.
By refusing narrative closure or moral certainty, Coetzee ensures that the character remains unresolved. This openness is central to his technique. Characters are not lessons; they are provocations.
The “showing” style intensifies this effect. Without authorial judgment, readers are left to wrestle with discomfort, ambiguity, and ethical unease—precisely the conditions under which Coetzee’s characters feel most alive.
Language as Distance, Not Decoration
Coetzee’s language is precise but emotionally distant. Metaphor is used sparingly, dialogue is often restrained, and narrative voice maintains a cool, almost clinical tone. This distance prevents emotional manipulation and reinforces the authenticity of character.
When emotion does appear, it feels earned. A brief gesture of care, a sudden breakdown, or a quiet act of responsibility carries immense weight because it emerges from such controlled prose.
Through linguistic restraint, Coetzee allows characters to surface organically, as if discovered rather than constructed.
Conclusion
J. M. Coetzee’s techniques of character creation rely on showing rather than telling, on restraint rather than excess, and on ethical tension rather than psychological exposition.
His characters, like Paul Rayment in Slow Man, are shaped by silence, by action, by bodily experience, and by moral pressure. They do not explain themselves; they reveal themselves slowly, often unwillingly.
In refusing to guide the reader’s judgment, Coetzee creates characters who linger long after the final page—unfinished, unsettling, and profoundly human. His method demonstrates that character is not something declared but something exposed, moment by moment, when certainty fails and choice becomes unavoidable.
All the images are generated by ChatGPT.
