It is an enduring puzzle: how does the novelist, that peculiar blend of magpie and demiurge, conjure beings from the void? How are these figments given voice, gait, and that crucial flicker of inner life that convinces us, for a few suspended hours, of their reality? If one seeks a rudimentary map to this shadowy terrain, then Dickens's A Tale of Two Cities, with its grand gestures and stark delineations, might serve as a rather emphatic, if not entirely subtle, starting point.
%2C_by_Fred_Barnard.jpeg) |
| Mme Defarge confronts Miss Pross |
Dickens, you see, was a master of the bold stroke, a caricaturist of genius who painted his players in colours that, while undeniably vivid, occasionally bordered on the theatrical. His men and women in this particular drama of London fog and Parisian fury possess a certain undeniable presence, a quality that leaps from the page and lodges itself, perhaps a little too firmly, in the mind.
Though let's be frank, this reality is often amplified, seasoned with a pinch of melodrama precisely when the intricate clockwork of his plot demands a particularly dramatic chime. Take Jarvis Lorry, that steadfast, perhaps slightly unimaginative, pillar of Tellson's Bank. He remains tethered to his ledgers and his unwavering sense of duty, a figure defined by his probity and a certain endearing lack of imaginative flight. Then there is Madame Defarge, a creature seemingly hewn from the very bedrock of revolutionary zeal, her knitting needles clicking with the relentless rhythm of fate, her purpose as sharp and unyielding as the blade that awaits its victims. They are, in a sense, embodiments of their roles, almost allegorical figures pressed into service within the grand pageant of history.
And Dr. Manette, the resurrected man, offers a particularly stark study in transformation. He reinvents himself, with a rather operatic flourish, into an advocate, his tools not legal precedents but the very instruments of his past suffering, a potent symbol of his journey from the abyss to a fragile form of redemption. His quest to save his son-in-law from the revolution's insatiable maw is less a nuanced legal wrangle and more a heroic, almost allegorical, undertaking.
Dickens, that tireless engine of narrative, that meticulous orchestrator of plot, understood the visceral impact of symbolism. In some of his other sprawling tapestries, these symbolic threads are woven with a more delicate, almost subterranean, artistry. Here, in A Tale of Two Cities, the approach is more direct, the colours applied with a broader brush. He employs sharp adjectives, a pointed, often satirical, wit, to etch his extensive gallery of characters.
Through these frequently exaggerated portrayals, he offers us a glimpse, albeit a somewhat heightened one, into the social anxieties and seismic shifts of his own era. As a chronicler of history, he lays bare the contradictions inherent in the French Revolution, its lofty ideals shadowed by its brutal realities.
And such is the indelible quality of his creations that one can almost imagine encountering their spectral forms amidst the hustle and bustle of a Victorian city. One might, perhaps, recognize Jerry Cruncher by that peculiar, resurrection-man shuffle, or discern the almost luminous serenity radiating from a passing woman who might just be a reincarnation of Lucy, or feel a sudden, inexplicable chill in the presence of a woman whose gaze seems to hold the frozen intensity of Madame Defarge's rage. Their very language, their characteristic turns of phrase, are inextricably linked to their essence. Mr. Lorry and Dr. Manette, with their measured cadences and professional gravitas, embody a certain cultivated sensibility of their time. Madame Defarge, in contrast, spits pronouncements with the fiery conviction of a revolutionary orator.
Born as it was to the weekly demands of a newspaper serial, each chapter often culminates in a sentence deliberately designed to resonate, to leave the reader suspended in a state of eager anticipation. And when Dickens, that master of the cliffhanger, discharged such a narrative volley, its reverberations were intended to reach the furthest corners of his readership. He didn't simply offer us characters; he presented us with archetypes, distilled versions of human nature rendered in vividly memorable form.
Indeed, one might argue that in the teeming theatre of life, one can still discern echoes, perhaps distorted reflections, of the very men and women Dickens brought into being. A mother might well observe her strikingly beautiful children and detect a faint resonance of a Dickensian heroine. His characters, in their glorious and often contradictory complexity, encompass the full spectrum of human experience: pride and vulnerability, generosity and avarice, cowardice and courage. Dickens, ever the astute observer of the human comedy and tragedy, absorbed the raw material of the world around him, transforming it into the enduring figures that have captivated readers for nearly two centuries. They persist, these creations, not merely as ink on paper, but as inhabitants of our collective imagination, a testament to the enduring power of a storyteller who, even with a touch of theatricality, knew how to make his people breathe.
